Saving Science
The scientific community of Australia has been rattled by rumours that the National Health and Medical Research Council is to have its funding cut by close to 20% in the upcoming May budget. There is now a nervous wait to see if the federal government will really slash $400 million from the NHMRC.
It seems extraordinarily short-sighted that such a move would be considered, but what is perhaps more disturbing is that the government is unlikely to have developed any such plan without some research of their own. I assume there must have been some conversations, market research, focus group study or similar. If this is the case and the government’s considered opinion is that the Australian people will accept such an irresponsible act, I would be both surprised and very disappointed.
Participants in a recent ANU study rated their level of interest in health, medical discoveries, environmental issues, scientific discoveries and new inventions ahead of music, politics and sports news. In terms of their contribution to society, scientists were outranked only by doctors and teachers.
Australia has a rich history of scientific research and I’m pretty sure that the vast bulk of Australians would be outraged if they were aware of the mooted NHMRC funding cut. The only fear is that they might not be aware and that it might slip quietly through in the background of the budget announcement. This is far less likely after rallies today in several Australian cities.
It’s rare that scientists protest, publically at least. They discuss and network; they debate and argue and sometimes they’ll even lobby, but public expressions of frustration, defiance and advocacy are very unusual. So when thousands of researchers take to the streets people should take notice and I think they will.
It was also pleasing to see the range of very clever posters and placards on display. I have included several of my favourites from the Melbourne rally here. I hope they give you a giggle and that the energy and creativity shown by our scientists may again be channelled into their work and appropriately supported by government.
Reader Comments